Committee Applications 2022/23

Applications for the 2022/23 ITSA committee are now open!

Fill out this application form and submit a short video (details of which are contained in the application form) to apply. APPLICATION DEADLINE: Midnight UK time on October 16th.

The available positions on the ITSA Committee are:

  • President
  • Vice President
  • Treasurer
  • Social Secretary
  • Regional Coordinator

London Law School Representatives for:

  • BPP
  • City
  • ULaw
  • ICCA

Regional Representatives for:

  • Manchester
  • Leeds
  • Bristol
  • Birmingham
  • Nottingham
  • Northumbria
  • Cardiff

Details of what each role entails can be found here.

Mini-Pupilage Deadlines

NB: Many chambers have suspended Mini-Pupillages in light of the Covid-19 pandemic. Applicants are advised to check the sets’ websites before applying. Some sets have their application forms available, but the site has not been updated since the coronavirus outbreak.

LONDON

CHAMBERS                                                   DEADLINE                                     APPLICATION TYPE

Henderson Chambers                        Midday 23 July 2021                                  Online Form

Quadrant Chambers                          30 June 2021 (September intake)             Online Form

                                                              31 October 2021 (December intake)

One Essex Court                                30 June 2021 (Oct-Dec intake)                   Online Form

                                                     30 November 2021 (Jan – Easter 2022 intake)

7 King’s Bench Walk                               1 July 2021                                             CV + Cover Letter

4 Stone Buildings                                   30 June 2021                                             Online Form

Ten Old Square                                       15 July 2021                                              Online Form

1 King’s Bench Watch                            31 August 2021                                        Online Form

Farras Building                                        15 July 2021                                            CV + Cover Letter

Landmark Chambers                              31 July 2021                                CV+ Cover Letter + Equal

                                                                                                             Opportunities Monitoring Form  

5 Essex Court                                           31 July 2021                                            Online Form

Tanfield Chambers                             Rolling (Virtual)                                           Email

4 Pump Court                                      Rolling (Virtual)                                           Online Form

20 Essex Chambers                            30 June 2021 (Virtual)                                Online Form

Keating Chambers                                1 September 2021                                    Online Form

3 Paper Building                                    Rolling                                                         Online Form

MANCHESTER

9 St John Street Mini Pupillage          31 October 2021 (Virtual)                       CV + Cover Letter

Kings Chambers                              Rolling (Virtual event on 24 June 2021)       Online Form

Deans Court                                    Application round opens on 21 June 2021     CV

BIRMINGHAM

3 Paper Building                                    Rolling                                                         Online Form

St Ives Chambers                                   Rolling                                                         CV + Cover Letter

Cornerstone Chambers                         31 July 2021                                              Online Form +          

                                                                                                  Equal Opportunities Monitoring Form 

Citadel Chambers                           1 November – 14 February                         CV + Cover Letter

                                                           (application window)                        (by post and NOT email)   

BRISTOL

3 Paper Building                                    Rolling                                                         Online Form

EXETER

Magdalen Chambers                            Rolling                                                         Online Form

LEEDS

KBW Chambers                                      Rolling                                                         Online Form

New Park court                                      Rolling                                                         CV

LIVERPOOL

Chavasse Court Chambers                   Rolling                                                         CV + Cover Letter

NOTTINGHAM

Ropewalk Chambers                              Rolling                                                         Online Form

1 High Pavement                            1 October – 31 November                        CV + Cover Letter

                                                            (application window – to be

                                                             reviewed in light of Covid-19)

KCH Garden Square                               Rolling (Virtual)                                          Online Form

NORTHAMPTON

Senate House Chambers                       1 July 2021                                           CV + Cover Letter

No 18 Chambers                                     Rolling                                                   CV + Cover Letter

SOUTHAMPTON

Pallant Chambers                                   Rolling                                                    CV + Cover Letter

OXFORD

3 Paper Building                                    Rolling                                                         Online Form

WINCHESTER

3 Paper Building                                    Rolling                                                         Online Form

BOURNEMOUTH

3 Paper Building                                    Rolling                                                         Online Form

Pujita Saini

ITSA’s Unofficial Guide to Preparation for Pupillage Interviews

The first thing to say is: well done on getting through the paper applications! The pupillage process can be a gruelling one and requires a significant amount of stamina. So, if you are reading this having just submitted your applications, then make sure that you give yourself a break between the application deadline and starting on your interview preparation. The interviews themselves can span a couple of months, so make sure that you are able to make it through the next stage whilst maintaining your wellbeing and preventing burnout.

Having said that, do be aware that interviews can be offered with only a couple of days’ notice, so I would not recommend waiting to start your preparation until you have received your first interview invite. Before moving to the substantive tips, I want to emphasise that most of this advice draws upon my own personal experience and that everyone has their own ways of working. Ultimately, the most important thing is making sure that you are in the right frame of mind for the interviews and everyone will have their own ways of getting to that point.

Top Tips for Preparation

  1. Get to grips with your key experiences.

This will involve a process of going through the deck of cards which represent all of your experiences that you have gathered over the past few years, legal and non-legal, and selecting your best hand of examples. You can then have these cards in your mind during the interview and, ideally, you will be able to pick one to play for each competency-based question.

You will need to have a few key examples of work and extra-curricular endeavours that demonstrate a range of competencies and that you can talk about comfortably. I would suggest trying to work out an engaging narrative for each example so that you have details included within your answer. For instance, if you co-founded an initiative, how many people did you do this with and what was your specific contribution? Or if you organised an event, how many attendees were there and who were the speakers? It is important to try not to have a scripted answer for each of these experiences, but you want to be sure on the details in case you are asked and you should be clear on the points and skills that you want to get across to the panel.

  1. Identify your “weak” points.

This is not about going through your application and putting yourself down or comparing yourself to others, but anticipating the points in your application that they might ask about or seek clarification on. For example, if you are applying for common law sets but your previous experience is largely in family law, they may well ask where your interest in criminal and civil practice stems from. Similarly, if you have not done much mooting, make sure you are prepared for questions about your advocacy skills and how you demonstrate these through other experiences. Remember that everyone’s application forms will look different and there are many ways to evidence that you fulfill each of the criteria, but you just need to be prepared for those trickier questions and be honest in your answers.

  1. Prepare for the obvious questions.

It is likely that at least a few of your interviews will involve questions about why you want to join the profession and why you would be well-suited to a career at the Bar, as well as why you want to be a pupil at that specific set. Therefore, these are questions that you should be prepared for with strong and succinct answers. Bear in mind that the panel will likely hear lots of similar answers to these questions, which is not a problem in itself and I do not think that they are expecting you to say anything revolutionary, but you should be able to respond confidently and coherently.

As above, try not to have completely scripted answers as this will come across to the panel. Although you should be prepared for these questions, try not to put too much focus on these as there are an infinite number of alternative questions that you could be asked and these questions might not come up at all during some interviews.

  1. Stay on top of current affairs.

Although you are likely engaged with current affairs already, make sure you start doing this in a more methodical way at least a couple of months before the interviews come around. Everyone will have their own way of doing this, but regularly reviewing legal news websites and listening to law-related podcasts is a good place to start. It may help to start compiling a list of key headlines and then familiarise yourself with the issues a few days before the interviews. It will be impossible to be au fait with every single news story that has a legal angle, but the major topics will start to emerge and you should read at least a couple of different articles on the big issues so that you are getting more of a rounded view.

  1. Prepare your case examples.

Similar to some application questions, interview panels might ask you to talk about a case you found interesting, one you think was wrongly decided, a judgment that you admire, etc. I would suggest having 4-5 cases that you are able to speak comfortably about. If the chambers has a particular focus on an area of law, then make sure some of your cases fall into that area. By having a few examples, you should be able to adapt to any variation of the case-based question. If you have time to read the judgment in full, then that is ideal, but otherwise make sure that you have read a few different articles on the case and have formed your own opinion. If there is a dissenting judgment, it is usually helpful to have a look at this too.

  1. Go back to basics.

Inevitably, you will not have time to studiously read back over all of your notes from the first year of your law degree (or the GDL). However, you should remind yourself of the fundamental principles of the foundational areas of law, including criminal law, contract law and tort. You can adapt your focus depending on the types of sets that you are applying to, but the panel might still throw a rogue question at you to see whether you can dig deep into your memory, or at least to see if you can formulate a coherent answer based on the basic principles. Again, it is impossible to prepare for every possible question that might be asked, but refreshing your understanding of the key areas of law should help to give you some grounding. Especially if, like me, there are a few years between your undergraduate degree and your pupillage applications.

  1. Get someone (or several people) to put you through a mock interview.

I know that these can feel incredibly painful. There is something very awkward about giving your answers when you know that it is not the real thing, but you have to get over that. Ideally, if you are able to have a mock interview with a barrister or current pupil, then this will be the closest you can get to the actual experience. Lots of people are much more willing to give up their time than you might expect, so there is no harm in asking anyone that you know to do this (or even reaching out to legal twitter). Most Inns and Bar Course providers also have mock interview schemes that applicants can sign up to, so make sure you look out for these.

Mock interviews are very important for a few reasons. First, they prepare you for the nerves that you might feel before you go into the real interview. Second, they build up your confidence in being able to answer tricky questions on the spot. Third, the feedback will likely be invaluable. You might receive feedback in relation to the content of your answers, the style in which you are answering them, or both. The mock interviewer will be able to pick up on small things that you may not notice when you are trying to assess yourself and this will give you the opportunity to correct certain phrases or habits before the real interviews. 

Top Tips During the Interview

The focus of this article is on advice for interview preparation, rather than your performance in the interview itself. However, based on my experience of both rejections and success, here are a few pointers to think about when you are in front of the panel:

  • Try to take a moment to consider and structure every response before answering. You do not have to answer straight away, and taking a second to breathe or sip your water can often bring slightly more clarity and calmness to your answer. 
  • Do not forget about non-verbal communication and body language. This is important in remote interviews as well as in-person ones. Although the panel should be focused on your answers, it is inevitable that some of their assessment of you will be based on how you present yourself as this is an important part of a career at the Bar. It sounds obvious, but the key things are eye contact, posture and trying not to fidget with anything.
  • Similarly, you should be aware of your tone of voice and pace. Even if you feel completely unsure on the inside, you want your exterior to come across as confident and self-assured. Try to speak slowly and clearly, as you would for any piece of advocacy.
  • A technique that helped me during interviews was trying to think of it as a conversation with colleagues rather than an interview. You still need to adhere to the formalities of an interview, of course, but I found that I performed better when I tried to relax into it and get more of a conversation going, especially during the debate-style questions.
  • Having said all of the above, the age-old adage still stands: be yourself. It seems like a cliche, but there is no point in trying to be what you think the panel wants you to be. It is likely that you will not come across as genuine and you may well be doing yourself a disservice by preventing yourself from finding the set most well-suited to you. You are in the interview room (or Zoom call) for a reason, and all you can do is make sure you are prepared, put your best foot forward and let your unique qualities shine through!

Nancy Kelehar

ITSA’s Recommendations: Podcasts and Books for the Bar

One of the questions we’re often asked is for recommendations for learning more about the Bar so we thought we’d group together the most recommended books and podcasts. Whilst we may not always have time for extra reading, podcasts are the perfect way to find time in an over-packed schedule whilst out for a walk/run/cycle, on the train or just doing practical laundry/house chores. These are recommendations that have been sent to us by a mixture of lawyers, students, and some that we have found useful ourselves. It is by no means an exhaustive list so if there is anything you would recommend adding to our list – please do get in touch with us, we’re always looking for extra suggestions.

Podcasts

Advocacy, Careers and Legal News

  • Talking Law https://talkinglaw.libsyn.com/
    “Presented by multi-award winning barrister Sally Penni MBE, Talking Law profiles leading figures in UK law as they discuss the highs and lows of their career plus the challenges and realities of the legal profession. From Women in the Law UK”

  • The Advocacy Podcast – Journeys to Excellence https://theadvocacypodcast.com/
    “The Advocacy Podcast covers wide-ranging topics in courtroom advocacy, from cross-examination and witness handling, to the soft-skills of advocacy, the neurology of trials and much more”
  • Get Legally Speaking with Hatti Suvari https://www.getlegallyspeaking.com/
    “Hosted by Hatti Suvari & featuring some of the top legal minds, Get Legally Speaking is changing the game by making law accessible to all. Join us every week as we speak to practising Barrister’s, QC’s and Judges on everything from divorce, and family law to employees’ rights, property law, consumer rights and much more.”

Specialist Areas of Law

Family Law

Civil, Public Law and Human Rights

  • Better Human https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/better-human-podcast/id1481010283
    “Can human rights make our societies better? This podcast explores the most important human rights issues of the day through engaging and accessible interviews with high-profile guests and straightforward guides to key concepts and key events. Presented by leading human rights lawyer Adam Wagner.”
  • Asymmetrical haircuts https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/
    Journalists Janet Anderson and Stephanie van den Berg delve into the world of international justice. We get experts on to talk about their field and ask them what everybody else forgets to ask.

Criminal Law

  • Criminal Justice Natters http://www.dredjohnston.com/criminal-justice-natters“A new podcast hosted by Dr Ed Johnston. Ed is a Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of the West of England. His research interests are centred in Criminal Justice, procedure and fair trial rights.”

Barristers’ Chambers with their own podcasts

  • 4 New Square https://www.4newsquare.com/podcasts/
    “Welcome to our podcast, Analysis: Commercial Dispute Resolution and Life at the Bar, in which we will examine a wide range of current issues in dispute resolution including commercial fraud, construction, costs and litigation funding, disciplinary and regulatory issues, insurance, international arbitration and commercial disputes, professional liability and sports.”
  • The Matrix Law Podhttps://soundcloud.com/matrix-law
    “A podcast hosted by Matrix Chambers which addresses how law, courts and the rule of law are holding up in the UK and abroad.”
  • Kings chambers https://www.kingschambers.com/latest-news/kings-chambers-podcast/ “The Kings Chambers Podcast brings together specialist legal experts to discuss current developments across all aspects of law in the United Kingdom featuring conversations with barristers and guest speakers from public and private sectors.”
  • 7BR https://www.7br.co.uk/2020/07/7br-part-heard-a-series-of-legal-podcasts/“7BR is delighted to present our podcast series: “7BR Part-Heard”. These podcasts will give an insight into the broad range of work our members undertake .”
  • Brick Court https://www.brickcourt.co.uk/centenary/podcasts
    In celebration of Brick Court’s 100th birthday in 2021, we are proud to present this series of programmes featuring past and present members of chambers in conversation, discussing their experience and experiences – in practice, on the bench and in all sorts of other places that a career in law has taken them.
  • Keating Chambers https://www.keatingchambers.com/resources/podcasts/ “Keating Chambers: The Podcast is a new fortnightly podcast brought to you by barristers and staff from Keating Chambers. It features a combination of key case law updates, historical case reviews, interviews with legal experts and informal discussions of aspects of Chambers life.”
  • 36 Commercial – A view from the Bar https://36commercial.buzzsprout.com/
    Our “A view from the Bar” podcasts engage with our areas of expertise and get our members chatting about issues that they are passionate about.

Also do have a browse of this list of podcasts made by our very own Inner Temple Library https://www.listennotes.com/listen/lockdown-law-pods-4sNQD9g-hIB/?display=podcast

Books

  • The Path to Pupillage: A Guide for the Aspiring Barrister www.amazon.co.uk/Path-Pupillage-Guide-Aspiring-Barrister/dp/0414025741
    “This is the essential guide for anyone considering a career as a barrister, from the sixth former to those at the final stage of the Bar Vocational Course. This book considers each step of the route to pupillage, the final and most competitive stage of a barrister’s training, offering detailed advice on everything from choosing the Bar as a career to succeeding in pupillage interviews.”

Jade-Amanda Laporte

Inner Temple – Scholarship Interviews

Each of the four Inns of Court (Inner Temple, Middle Temple, Gray’s Inn, and Lincoln’s Inn) offers scholarships to hundreds of students each year studying the GDL and the Bar Course. The application and interview process differs for each Inn, and (unsurprisingly), this article will concentrate on the process for Inner Temple. I hope, however, that my tips will be applicable for scholarship interviews at the other Inns too.

The Inner Temple Application Process

For the GDL and Bar Course, the scholarship application process begins with a written form. Inner has a huge advantage in that they generally interview every candidate who applies. Make sure you don’t leave submitting to the last minute and check with your referees in good time before you apply. After submitting your written form, you will receive a date and time for your interview, which will most likely be a Friday evening or Saturday.

The interview for the GDL and Bar Course differs slightly. For the Bar Course, you will be given a short judgment to read thirty minutes before your interview. Part of the interview will then comprise questions on the judgment, such as identifying the arguments of each party, summarising the judgment, or offering your opinion on the case. Then, you will have a general interview with the panel about your application. The GDL does not have the judgment element of the interview and rather goes straight into questions about your application form, motivations for becoming a barrister, and any other questions the panel wishes to ask. You are usually asked to do a short advocacy exercise in both GDL and Bar Course interviews, whereby the panel might ask you to argue for or against a current affair or general debate topic. At the end of the interview, the panel will ask you questions surrounding your personal financial circumstances.

Top Tips

Having interviewed for a scholarship at Inner three times – twice successfully, and once unsuccessfully – I hope to be in a fairly good position to give my advice! Above all (and it is easier said than done), stay calm and confident, and try to enjoy yourself.

My first top tip relates to the application form. It sounds obvious, but make sure you can talk about everything you write on your form, as you could be asked about anything in the interview. I was actually asked about something one of my referees had put on a reference – about an essay I had written at university – which I had not anticipated! Before your interview, go through your form forensically and pick out any detail you could be asked on and make sure you can elaborate on it. I made bullet points on everything I had written about – from work to mini-pupillages to extra-curricular activities and any other examples I had given – and just elaborated a few sentences so I knew I could elaborate on everything I had written.

My second tip relates to the advocacy exercise. As discussed above, there is likely to be a part of the interview where you will be asked to speak about a topic or debate. Make sure you keep up with current affairs and think about any topical debates happening at the moment. Practice thinking of any topic and speaking about it for a minute, and you could even do this with friends or family. This will help you practice thinking and speaking under pressure about a topic which you may not previously have thought about. It’s really important that you have a clear structure for this part, so you might want to use signposting (e.g. I have three points to make: firstly…, secondly…) as this part of the interview is a test of your potential as an advocate. It’s much easier to be persuasive when you can clearly follow the points someone is making.

My final tip relates to both the form and the interview. Have a look on the Inner Temple website and find the application criteria (you can find them here: https://www.innertemple.org.uk/becoming-a-barrister/scholarships/application-criteria-general-guidelines/). Think about each point, and how your experiences and skills fit into each one. For example, Inner has said that they are looking for ‘Character – Calmness under fire, the ability to work hard for long hours and against deadlines, sound personal values, and integrity. So, you might want to think of a time where can you show that you have done this – such as working in a bar, balancing a degree with extra-curricular activities, or anything else relevant. Just before your interview, write down your top three examples of skills that you want the panel to know about.

Finally, it is important to remember that anyone could get a scholarship, and you have to believe that it could be you! Make sure you are true to yourself; in answer to the question ‘why the bar?’, you should answer genuinely, not what you think you ‘should’ be saying or what the panel wants to hear. I was so nervous, but the panels were all lovely; they are practicing barristers that have given you their free time to listen to your story, and they want you to succeed. I wish you all the best of luck and feel free to reach out with any questions.

Lauren Gardner

RTA Reform

Will the Governments ‘Whiplash Reform Programme’ implemented on the 31st of March 2021 work to prevent access to Justice?

Why did we need this reform?

The Government of the day has found through consultations with industry experts on whiplash claims, due to the sheer quantity of whiplash claims, car insurance premiums are exorbitant. It was hoped the introduce reform could lower the cost of insurance premiums by approximately £45 per annum for road users.

In the Civil Court, the overriding objective maintains that all parties be on an equal footing, can participate fully in proceeding and witnesses can give their best evidence; as such, every reform that is introduced should work to further this objective.

How has the reform affected Road Traffic Claims?

Prior to the implementation of new regulations on the 31st of March 2021, rule 26.6 of the CPR provided that Road Traffic Claims (‘RTCs’) will be allocated to the small claims track if the personal injury did not exceed the value of £1,000. The new regulations increased said limit to encompass claims for personal injury of up to £5,000 and an additional £5,000 of protocol damages (credit hire fees excluded). However, those who suffer injury and are ‘protected parties’ have their cases automatically assigned to the fast track.

Before the new reforms were implemented the total fee awarded to a complainant was a highly contentious matter to discern, however, the latest reforms have implemented a tariff system which details that one would be able to claim a maximum of £260 for injuries lasting no more than three months, and £4,345 for injuries lasting up to twenty-four months. Some have criticised this reform for setting the tariffs at too low a level, this system will only apply to RTC claims resulting in minor psychological injuries. Further, whiplash claims must now be substantiated with medical evidence.

As consequence of these changes, many more RTA claims would find themselves on the small claims track where legal costs are non-recoverable; this of course naturally raises a barrier to justice to those from certain socio-economic backgrounds as their inability to pay for legal representation will invariably affect the likelihood of a claimant’s success. To combat this the government have introduced Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) for RTA claims and the Official Injury Claim service which has been introduced to process claims out of court. Although, legal costs are again, non-recoverable through the Official Injury Claim service.

What affect does this have on a claimant’s access to justice?

Rule 1.7 of the Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims states – “If a party to the claim does not have a legal representative they should still, in so far as reasonably possible, fully comply with this Protocol”. Any reference to a claimant in this Protocol will also mean the claimant’s legal representative. This in itself raises issues of concern as the new online system is one that has recently come into existence and is understood currently only by industry experts who have been anticipating such a change; conversely, the public have heard little to nothing on the coming reform due to a lack of advertisement about the new provisions from the government of the day. This is partially due to the pandemic we find ourselves within. This in turn, leaves ordinary claimants faced with a system they have no knowledge of, bound by rules they are not privy to such as the instructing party having to bear the cost of an expert witness. In my opinion, this will only lead to self-represented claimants attempting to bypass this process to represent themselves on the small claims track where they feel they will be aided through the process by the court system. Or alternatively, mean one must undertake legal services to process their claim through the online system. Whilst this would unquestionably alleviate some stress on the court, it would in turn restrict access to justice to those who can afford it, as legal fees are not recoverable on either the small claims track or via the Official Injury Claim service. Thus, in most RTCs, the cost of legal representation will outweigh the prospective damages leaving claimants with only justice through admission and no real reparations as consequence of the damages they faced.

In conclusion, this reform will likely succeed in reducing road insurance premiums by drastically reducing the amount of RTCs claims pursued, those that are successful and the overall cost of damages arising from RTCs. However, it is vital we appreciate that this has been done to the detriment of the victim, providing them with more legal hurdles and jargon that they are not equipped to face in their pursuit of justice.

Jack Nicholas Ferdinando

Alternative legal careers

Often, career talks are dominated by pupillage applications. What you don’t get told though, is that there are a whole load of other jobs out there that are just as fascinating. If, like me, you don’t know what kind of law you’re interested in, these roles offer time for exploration, experimentation and excitement, and the much-desired breathing space to actually figure life out! Here are a few of my highlights:

International Bar Association (IBA) – Internship

https://www.ibanet.org/legal-internship-programme-applications

If you’re looking for something short-term but fascinating, the IBA’s three-month internships may be for you! These are located in London, Washington DC and the Hague and so could also be a chance to expand your legal and geographical horizons. In London, interns are based at the Human Rights Institute, the Legal and Research Policy Unit or with the Executive Director. Work involves legal research and written advocacy and could put you at the forefront of developments in environmental law, media freedoms or the digital revolution. While it is unpaid, there is the option of the IBA Bursary which offers up to £2000 (for London internships). Applications are accepted on a rolling basis so also no need to rush!

Court of Appeal/ High Court – Judicial Assistant

Interested in the behind the scenes of the hottest up and coming cases? Then just imagine life as a Judicial Assistant: not only would you have the chance to watch some of the best barristers in the country, but you would even get the opportunity to get to know the judges presiding. As your role would be to produce case summaries, memoranda, and conduct legal research, these positions offer a unique path into figuring out the next steps in your own career. Applications for the Court of Appeal open on the Ministry of Justice website in April and applications for the High Court open in May on judiciary.uk. They are fixed term positions with a good salary. Keep your eyes peeled!

Law Commission – Research Assistant

The Law Commission operate at the heart of cutting-edge law reforms. Their previous work has focused on surrogacy, digital currencies, driverless cars and rent reforms and so offers a breadth of experience its difficult to find anywhere else. Working within a team of economists, legal professionals and parliamentary officials, this role would give you the opportunity to mix with a range of stakeholders and develop professional relationships across the board. It would hone those research skills and give you an edge in any other application you make.

LPC Law – Self-employed Advocate

Crucially, this role offers the advocacy experience that every law student dreams of. From summary judgment applications to costs orders, this role will give you the chance to put your BTC knowledge to the test! You will get the chance to tackle a range of subject matter and become familiar with the County Court set up that you will experience in pupillage. The role also enables you to set your own working hours, enabling you to strike your own work-life balance or pursue other ventures on the side. Applications are set to open around 30th July and involve an interim application exercise.

Disability and the Bar Course

The purpose of this small piece of literature is an attempt to help elevate any concerns that those with a disability (specifically hearing) may have before starting the Bar course. My journey was unusual, certainly compared to the many who say their BPTC examinations before me, as I had only four weeks of face-to-face learning as a result of COVID.

I offer my 4 top pieces of advice.

Meet your disability team

Hopefully, you will have some form of disability support at your university. Meet with them as soon as you can. Explain how you learn. If you understand better with visual aids, explain this, and the team will hopefully attempt to put something together for you. If you struggle with notetaking because you need to lip-read and look at your notepad, I recommend looking up the website otter.ai – this is something a Barrister at Doughty Street Chambers recommended. I cannot tell you how valuable this website was. I purchased a mini-iPad for ease of using otter and I was even able to use my iPhone when I needed to.

If you find you’re not getting the support you need, then keep contacting the disability team and insist they help you. Remember, you are the customer.

Don’t be shy

I was open about my hearing impairment, and I told my classmate how I best communicate telling them where I might struggle. For example, Advocacy classes moved online, making lip-reading difficult. To counteract the problem, I asked my tutor to allow a few extra minutes during cross-examination in case I needed to ask for my witness to repeat their answer. My classmates playing said witnesses knew from the beginning they’d need to be a little patient with me.

The other benefit to being open was that I had confidence; I wasn’t worrying about what others thought. Because I could focus on my performance instead of my ears, I didn’t need the extra time – and so my performance was good, I received positive feedback (as well the bad of course) and I felt very confident in my Advocacy assessments too.

Get out of the comfort zone

So many events were forced online, such as classes, Qualifying Sessions and Societies. Like so many will tell you, being online was overwhelming. But I pushed myself through it and made myself noticed. Through classes, I’ve made some good friends, and even now, after the BPC has finished, we still keep in touch. Qualifying Sessions were daunting, and one session was an Advocacy masterclass which I struggled with, as there was so much happening at once. The volunteering barristers really helpfully offered a private 1-1 session. By getting involved with societies as much as I can, I’ve made some friends that way, and even though it has all been virtual, we’ve had some good laughs and tears. We have become a small community cheering one another on. I hope I’ll meet them all one day soon and we can have a proper celebration without being reduced to the size of a postage stamp on a screen.

Enjoy it

Although not advice it is a friendly comment to say that you must try and enjoy the course as much as possible. It was 20 weeks of intensive study, with barely time to rest. More so for me, as I had to do extra to keep on top of my workload. Despite the demands, I made sure I enjoyed the entire experience. Together my classmates and I made the lessons fun. We had the odd clowning around, which even the tutors appreciated as it took the edge off online learning. Socials were held online, either quiz nights or even watching a film together (note: pressing ‘play’ at the right time is more challenging than you might expect), and there was even a cocktail masterclass. So, don’t let your disability be a barrier to your learning or from your experience.

Overall, online learning was not as bad as I expected, if anything it has made me a far more resilient and adaptable, which will serve me well in my future. I have met some fantastic people, had some stomach-ache resulting laughs and we have all supported one another before, during and post examinations. Together we’ve become a small legal family.

The above is based on my personal experience in 2020-21 during COVID. You are welcome to reach out to me if you have any questions. 

Adam Kingaby-Daly